Hotjar vs UserVista: A Comprehensive Comparison

Luke Hardy
July 24, 2024
5
Reading

In the world of user experience analytics and feedback collection, Hotjar and UserVista are two notable players. While Hotjar offers a comprehensive suite of tools, UserVista focuses on streamlined in-app surveys. Let's dive into the details of both platforms.Hotjar: The All-in-One UX Insights PlatformHotjar provides a robust set of tools designed to give you a 360-degree view of your users' behavior and feedback. Here are some of its key features:

  1. Heatmaps: Hotjar's heatmaps visually represent where users click, move, and scroll on your site. This feature helps you understand user interaction patterns and optimize your page layouts.
  2. Session Recordings: These are playbacks of user sessions on your site, including clicks, mouse movements, and even "rage clicks".
  3. Feedback Tools: Hotjar offers a real-time suggestion box for users to express their thoughts about specific parts of your site.
  4. Surveys: You can create targeted surveys to validate ideas and better understand your users.
  5. User Interviews: Hotjar allows you to automate the recruitment, scheduling, and hosting of moderated user interviews.

Hotjar's Pricing StructureHotjar uses a sliding scale pricing model based on the number of daily sessions:

  1. Basic Plan: Free forever, limited to 35 daily sessions.
  2. Plus Plan: Starts at $32/month for up to 100 daily sessions.
  3. Business Plan: Starts at $80/month for up to 500 daily sessions.
  4. Scale Plan: Starts at $171/month for up to 4,000 daily sessions.

As you move up the pricing tiers, you gain access to more advanced features:

  • The Business plan introduces features like funnels, trends, and console tracking for errors.
  • The Scale plan adds features like entered text and error filters, API access for user lookup and deletion, webhooks, and SAML single sign-on.

UserVista: Focused In-App Survey SolutionUserVista takes a more targeted approach, specializing in in-app surveys and user feedback collection. Here are its key features:

  1. In-App Surveys: UserVista allows you to launch in-app surveys quickly, integrating seamlessly with your application's design.
  2. 50+ Survey Templates: The platform offers a wide range of pre-designed survey templates, including NPS, CSAT, multiple choice, and open response surveys.
  3. Trigger on Rage Click: UserVista can trigger surveys when a user shows signs of frustration, such as clicking fervently on a page.
  4. AI-Powered Feedback Summarization: UserVista allows you to summarize hundreds of responses with a single click, using AI to analyze and synthesize user feedback.
  5. Display as Feedback Button: Surveys can be hidden behind a feedback button, providing a less intrusive option for collecting user input.

Comparison and ConclusionWhile Hotjar offers a comprehensive suite of UX analysis tools, including heatmaps and session recordings, UserVista focuses on providing a streamlined, easy-to-use in-app survey solution. Hotjar's sliding scale pricing model allows for scalability but can become costly for high-traffic websites. UserVista, being more specialized, may offer a more cost-effective solution for businesses primarily interested in collecting direct user feedback through surveys.Hotjar's strength lies in its ability to provide visual insights into user behavior, which can be invaluable for UX designers and marketers. However, for businesses looking for a quick and easy way to gather user feedback within their applications, UserVista's focused approach and AI-powered analysis tools could be more appealing.Ultimately, the choice between Hotjar and UserVista will depend on your specific needs. If you require comprehensive UX analysis tools and have the budget to support it, Hotjar could be the better choice. However, if your primary goal is to quickly implement in-app surveys and efficiently analyze user feedback, UserVista might be the more suitable option.

Get In Touch

Ready to go get some
insights?

Egestas dictum lectus diam commodo. Et tristique nunc faucibus sit tortor commodo aliquet commodo quam. Id suspendisse vel in non arcu, interdum quis placerat accumsan.

Particle